Najeib family campaign statement
14 December 2001
Almost two years after he was brutally assaulted, student Sarfraz Najeib is
still struggling to rebuild his life. The 21-year-old bears physical scars
from the attack and continues to suffer psychologically from his ordeal.
Meanwhile, Leeds United defender Jonathan Woodgate has been given 100 hours
community service after being found guilty of affray over a brutal street
attack on a student. He was cleared of the more serious charge of grievous
bodily harm with intent. His team-mate Lee Bowyer walked free from Hull crown
court after being cleared of causing grievous bodily harm with intent and
affray.
Woodgate's friend Paul Clifford was sentenced to six years in prison after
being found guilty of affray and causing GBH for his part in the attack on
Sarfraz Najeib, who suffered severe injuries, including a broken nose and
cheekbone, a fractured leg and a bite on the cheek during the attack in
January 2000.
Another friend of Woodgate's, Neale Caveney, was found guilty of affray but
cleared of causing GBH. He too received 100 hours of community service.
At a press conference held outside court the family expressed their
gratitude to the following individuals:
the brave and courageous witnesses for coming to the court and, to use Mr
Duberry's words, 'telling it like it was';
Superintendent Hemsley and his team of investigators for collating all the
evidence in a competent manner and his concern for the Najeib family;
and Mr Campbell and Mr Waterman of the CPS for their preparation and
thoroughness in presenting the case in court.
The result is a tremendous disappointment for the family. Ever since the
brutal, savage and racist attack on Sarfraz the family have gone through
living hell. Both Sarfraz and Shazad have still not recovered fully from
their injuries. The prominence of the defendants and the likelihood of them
being convicted has resulted in a race hate campaign against the family.
Only last week, Mr Najeib's car tyre was slashed and several serious threats
have been made against Mr Najeib at his take-away shop in Sheffield.
The attack on Sarfraz was motivated by racism. Although this may not have
been the only motive it was, nevertheless, significant. Despite public
announcements and directions by the trial judges and the concession by the
Crown Prosecution Service, the family have not been in doubt
about this issue. They remain mystified as to the reason why Safraz was
asked not to repeat in court the racist threat directed at him immediately
before he was punched. Sarfraz clearly remembers the words 'do you want some
paki?' before he was attacked, and included the remark in his statement to the
police.
The family are angry with the conduct of Leeds United Football Club
throughout the affair. They have allowed both players to play whilst they
were charged. In Spring 2000, Mr Najieb and his supporters, including
Neville Lawrence, father of Stephen Lawrence, met with Mr Risdale at Elland
Road to ask for the players to be suspended whilst they were accused of the
charges. His attitude was both insensitive and unsympathetic. At the meeting
he expressed concern at the growth of racist chanting by Leeds United
supporters but offered no strategy for dealing with the problem. The
McCormick affair further heightens our concerns. We will raise these issues
with the Football Association.
We have done everything in our power to bring those responsible for the
savage attack to justice, but justice has been denied. It has always been
difficult for our communities to attain justice in this country and these
verdicts only serve to shatter our faith even more. However, we remain
determined to bring those responsible to justice, and would say to anyone
who has faced racist attacks stand tall and fight.